Google search engine
HomeWorkoutIncluding nuance to the connection between power density and calorie consumption •...

Including nuance to the connection between power density and calorie consumption • Stronger by Science

Vitality density is a really simple metric: in the event you divide the power content material of a meal (in kilocalories) by the mass of the meal (in grams), you get the power density. Meals with low power density are likely to have comparatively greater content material of water and fiber, on common, when in comparison with meals with greater power density. Meals with low power density fill our plates (and our stomachs) with out delivering an enormous caloric load; in consequence, they are typically related to comparatively better satiety, higher starvation administration, and decrease power consumption. By extension, dieters pursuing weight reduction objectives are sometimes suggested to hunt out meals with low power density, and to cut back consumption of meals with greater power density. Listed here are a number of examples of the power density of particular person meals (in kcal/g models): lettuce (0.15), watermelon (0.30), grapes (0.69), skinless rooster breast (1.10), white bread (2.64), peanuts (6.00), and olive oil (8.85).

Think about a hypothetical state of affairs through which you’re collaborating in a analysis research. In a single research situation, you present as much as the lab a number of hours after your most up-to-date meal, you’re given a limitless quantity of watermelon, and also you’re inspired to eat till you’re happy. In a second research situation, the procedures are equivalent, however you obtain a limitless quantity of cheesecake as an alternative of watermelon. Essentially the most fundamental utility of power density could be very easy: you’re in all probability going to eat extra whole energy throughout the cheesecake go to than the watermelon go to. However what is definitely dictating your consumption? It doesn’t seem like the mass or quantity of meals alone – you’d in all probability eat a bigger mass and quantity of watermelon than cheesecake, even if the cheesecake offers extra energy. Nevertheless, it additionally doesn’t seem like calorie content material alone – if that have been the case, you’d merely eat the identical quantity of whole power at every go to, which might require large quantities of watermelon consumption to make the energy you consumed throughout the cheesecake go to.

The presently reviewed research by Flynn and colleagues (1) explored this idea by way of retrospective evaluation of beforehand collected information. They first analyzed the information from a paper by Corridor et al (2), which explored the consequences of ultra-processed meals consumption on power consumption and weight acquire in tightly managed situations. Dr. Helms reviewed that research when it was first revealed, again in Quantity 3 of MASS Analysis Assessment. Additionally they analyzed information from the UK Nationwide Weight loss program and Vitamin Survey, particularly trying on the 2000-2001 information from individuals between the ages of 19-64 years previous (3). This was an infinite survey meant to doc the consuming habits and dietary standing of the UK inhabitants, which contributed information from 1,724 people for the presently reviewed evaluation. These two information units allowed the researchers to individually have a look at tightly managed, lab-based information and an enormous pattern of knowledge from free-living people, and their evaluation aimed to evaluate the connection between the power density of a meal and the variety of whole energy consumed on the meal.

Each information units led to comparable conclusions. When the general power density of a meal is low, meals quantity appears to be the predominant satiation sign dictating the quantity of meals consumed. The bodily quantity of house inside an individual’s abdomen is inherently restricted, and meals consumption is discontinued as soon as a sure quantity of meals consumption is achieved with a purpose to keep away from the discomfort related to being overly full. The physique senses that this level is reached primarily based largely on the diploma of gastric distention, with out a lot affect in any respect from the full quantity of power consumed. Nevertheless, there may be an inflection level (in all probability between an power density worth of 1.25 and a couple of.25, give or take) past which meals quantity is now not the predominant satiation sign. As the general power density of the meal will get greater, power content material turns into the most important satiation sign dictating the quantity of meals consumed. Actually, meal dimension (in grams) tends to go down as power density turns into very excessive. The researchers posit that the physique integrates organic alerts figuring out excessive intakes of carbohydrate, fats, protein, and whole power, and ultimately alerts the discontinuation of the meal with a purpose to keep away from discomfort and “soporific” (drowsiness-inducing) results associated to extreme acute power consumption. The proposed two-component mannequin of meal dimension is depicted in Determine 1.

Graphic by Kat Whitfield

It’s vital to acknowledge that this mannequin is just not, and doesn’t declare to be, the singular mannequin that explains everything of human meal dimension choice and power consumption. Because the authors word, it makes no effort to immediately account for macronutrient content material, cravings, hedonic consuming, or the numerous different complicating elements that may affect consuming behaviors. Nonetheless, it fills an vital hole within the literature. There are various completely different paradigms used to discover the consequences of power density on meal dimension and power consumption. For instance, there are preload take a look at meal research (e.g., individuals are fed a small snack shortly earlier than a meal to see the way it impacts consuming habits), short-term advert libitum research (<10 days in period), and longer-term advert libitum research. Throughout these completely different research paradigms, the connection between power density, power consumption, and meal dimension appeared very inconsistent, as famous by the authors of the current research. Nevertheless, when viewing these completely different our bodies of literature via the prism of the two-component mannequin depicted in Determine 1, the obvious discrepancies in earlier research have been largely resolved. Collectively, the literature means that meals quantity is the important thing satiation sign when meal power density is beneath ~1.75 kcal/g, whereas calorie content material is the important thing satiation sign when meal power density is above ~1.75 kcal/g.

Other than filling a spot within the literature, this research additionally offers some steerage for sensible utility. When looking for out meals with low power density, it looks like 1.75 kcal/g is an honest quantity to purpose beneath. This isn’t a wonderfully inflexible threshold, in fact, but it surely serves as an honest information. As well as, in the event you’re making an attempt to leverage low power density meals as a technique to handle starvation throughout a weight reduction weight loss program, it in all probability is smart to focus extra on the general power density of the meal relatively than particular person meals. For instance, if swapping in a single meals with low power density drops the general power density of a meal from 4.0 to three.0, you’re nonetheless in a state of affairs the place meals quantity is just not the predominant satiation sign, and the relative influence of this technique will in all probability be modest in magnitude. In distinction, the same meals swap that brings the general power density of a meal from 2.5 to 1.5, or from 2.0 to 1.0, is more likely to have a relatively bigger influence because the predominant satiation sign switches from calorie content material to meals quantity. 

This single technique isn’t more likely to single-handedly revolutionize the best way you weight loss program, however it could actually in all probability be mixed with different satiety-related methods to have a useful cumulative influence. As said beforehand, some sensible methods which will facilitate higher starvation administration throughout power restriction contain adopting an acceptance-oriented strategy to starvation, avoiding hyperpalatable meals, emphasizing unprocessed or minimally processed meals, incorporating some tougher meals textures, consuming extra mindfully, avoiding distractions whereas consuming, and taking time to savor the aromas and flavors of our meal. Manipulating meal-level power density is only one extra software so as to add to the toolbox.

Be aware: This text was revealed in partnership with MASS Analysis Assessment. Full variations of Analysis Highlight breakdowns are initially revealed in MASS Analysis Assessment. Subscribe to MASS to get a month-to-month publication with breakdowns of current train and diet research.


  1.   Flynn AN, Corridor KD, Courville AB, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM. Time To Revisit The Passive Overconsumption Speculation? People Present Sensitivity To Energy In Vitality-Wealthy Meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Aug 1;116(2):581–8.
  2.   Corridor KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, et al. Extremely-Processed Diets Trigger Extra Calorie Consumption and Weight Acquire: An Inpatient Randomized Managed Trial of Advert Libitum Meals Consumption. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):67-77.e3.
  3.   Swan G. Findings From The Newest Nationwide Weight loss program And Vitamin Survey. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Nov;63(4):505–12.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments