In September 2022, The Epoch Occasions requested the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention to launch its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) knowledge mining outcomes. PRR1 measures how frequent an hostile occasion is for a particular drug in comparison with all the opposite medicine within the database.
In accordance with the usual working procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Hostile Occasion Reporting System (VAERS), which is run collectively by the CDC and the Meals and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to carry out these knowledge mining analyses.
Not solely did the CDC refuse to launch the info, however it additionally offered false data — twice — in response to The Epoch Occasions’ questions concerning the monitoring being carried out. As reported by The Epoch Occasions again in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses have been “outdoors the company’s purview” and that no monitoring was being achieved by them.
Finally, the company admitted it was doing PRRs, beginning in February 2021, solely to later declare they did not carry out any PRRs till March 2022. The Epoch Occasions additionally cited a number of papers by which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their knowledge mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we discover that was all a pack of lies.
CDC Monitoring Reveals Lots of of Security Alerts
In actuality, the CDC’s PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of security indicators, together with Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and demise — all of which, in line with the principles, require thorough investigation to both affirm or rule out a potential hyperlink to the photographs. As reported by The Epoch Occasions in early January 2023:6
“The CDC evaluation was performed on hostile occasions reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Occasions obtained the outcomes via a Freedom of Info Act request after the CDC refused to make the outcomes public …
PRR includes evaluating the incidence of a particular hostile occasion after a particular vaccine to the incidence in any case different vaccines. A sign is triggered when three thresholds are met, in line with the CDC: a PRR of at the very least 2, a chi-squared statistic of at the very least 4, and three or extra circumstances of the occasion following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared exams are a type of statistical evaluation used to look at knowledge.
The outcomes obtained by The Epoch Occasions present that there are a whole bunch of hostile occasions (AEs) that meet the definition, together with critical situations resembling blood clotting within the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a scarcity of oxygen to the guts, and even demise. The excessive numbers, notably the chi-squared figures, involved consultants.
For lots of the occasions, ‘the chi-squared is so excessive that, from a Bayesian perspective, the likelihood that the true charge of the AE of the COVID vaccines will not be greater than that of the non-COVID vaccines is actually zero,’ Norman Fenton, a professor of threat administration at Queen Mary College of London, informed The Epoch Occasions in an electronic mail after operating the numbers via a Bayesian mannequin that gives possibilities primarily based on accessible data.”
Myopericarditis Is Far From the Solely Drawback
One of many few uncomfortable side effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has really acknowledged is myocarditis (coronary heart irritation), and a associated situation known as pericarditis (irritation of the guts sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring outcomes reveal there are greater than 500 different hostile occasions which have stronger warning indicators than both of these situations.
Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor educated in statistics at Princeton College informed The Epoch Occasions:7
“We all know that the sign for myocarditis is related to one thing that’s attributable to the mRNA vaccines, so it is greater than cheap to say that something with a sign bigger than myocarditis/pericarditis must be taken critically and investigated.”
Guetzkow expanded on his commentary in a January 4, 2023, Substack article.8 Under is a abstract record of a number of the key findings from the CDC’s PRR evaluation. Guetzkow goes deeper in his article, so for extra particulars, I recommend studying it in its entirety.
For much more analyses and commentary, see Fenton’s Substack article, “The CDC’s Information on COVID Vaccine Security Alerts.”9 If you wish to examine the PRR knowledge for your self, you may obtain them from The Epoch Occasions’ January 3, 2023, article.10 You can too discover them right here.11
|
In people aged 18 and older, there are security indicators for 770 completely different hostile occasions, and two-thirds of them (greater than 500) have a stronger security sign than myocarditis and pericarditis. Of these 770 indicators, 12 are brand-new situations that haven’t been reported following different vaccines. Topping the record of security indicators are cardiovascular situations, adopted by neurological situations. In third and fourth place are thromboembolic situations and pulmonary situations. Demise is sixth on the record and most cancers is eleventh. Contemplating the uptick we have seen in aggressive cancers, the truth that demise tops most cancers actually says one thing. |
|
The variety of critical hostile occasions reported between mid-December 2020 and the top of July 2022 (simply over 19 months) for the COVID jabs is 5.5 instances larger than all critical reviews for vaccines given to adults within the U.S. over the past 13 years (roughly 73,000 versus 13,000). |
|
Twice as many COVID jab reviews have been categorized as critical in comparison with all different vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%), which meets the definition of a security sign. |
|
The proportions of reported deaths, which was solely offered for the 18+ age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs in comparison with 4.7% for all different vaccines. As famous by Fenton,12 “If the CDC want [sic] to assert that the likelihood a COVID vaccine hostile occasion leads to demise will not be considerably greater than that of different vaccines the onus is on them to give you another causal clarification for this distinction.” |
|
Within the 12- to 17-year-old age group, there are 96 security indicators, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, hypertension, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetency, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, thrombosis, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest ache and elevated troponin ranges (indicative of coronary heart harm). |
|
Within the 5- to 11-year-old group, there are 66 security indicators, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest ache, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s illness, menstrual irregularities and vitiligo. |
It is price noting that the CDC did not carry out its first security sign evaluation till March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the photographs have been rolled out. Why the lengthy wait — particularly because the CDC had introduced it might start monitoring in early 2021? Simply think about, for a second, what number of lives have been misplaced as a result of the CDC didn’t correctly monitor security, and nonetheless drags its toes in relation to warning folks concerning the dangers concerned.
FDA Nonetheless Refuses to Share Security Information
The FDA can be required to carry out security monitoring utilizing one other approach known as Empirical Bayesian knowledge mining. The Epoch Occasions first requested the FDA to launch its monitoring outcomes again in July 2022,13,14 however just like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the info confirmed no proof of significant hostile results. In different phrases, “Simply belief us. We’re consultants.”
In accordance with the FDA, the one potential sign they’d discovered via April 16, 2021, was for raised physique temperature.15 Then, in mid-December 2022 — simply 4 months after The Epoch Occasions tried to get these knowledge — the FDA introduced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood move within the lungs) had met the edge for a statistical sign, and continued to satisfy the factors after in-depth analysis, however it was solely linked to the Pfizer jab.16
As famous by The Epoch Occasions,17 pulmonary embolism can be recognized as a sign within the CDC’s PRR evaluation for people as younger as 12, which actually should strengthen considerations.
The FDA additionally admitted it had already evaluated three different warning indicators: lack of oxygen to the guts, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet dysfunction) and intravascular coagulation (a sort of blood clotting), however none of those continued to satisfy the edge after evaluation.
If the FDA was evaluating 4 warning indicators, why did they inform The Epoch Occasions there was no proof of in poor health results, and why did they declare the one potential sign they’d discovered was slight fever? Are we to consider they found these indicators after The Epoch Occasions requested for the monitoring outcomes after which accomplished 4 in-depth investigations in 4 months?
Regardless of the fact, it is clear that each the CDC and FDA are usually not being clear. Worse, they’ve hidden knowledge, understanding it might imply the distinction between life and demise for a whole bunch of 1000’s of individuals.
CDC Has Ignored Clear ‘Demise’ Sign
The CDC ignoring a transparent sign for demise might be essentially the most egregious instance of its failures as a public well being establishment. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford printed a three-part sequence18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding security indicators through the use of a flawed system. In August that 12 months, Steve Kirsch knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was ignored.
Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,21 Kirsch went on to point out how “demise” ought to have triggered a sign even when utilizing the CDC’s flawed system (which is described in its VAERS commonplace working procedures guide22). This is an excerpt:23
“The system the CDC makes use of for producing security indicators is basically flawed; a ‘dangerous’ vaccine with plenty of hostile occasions will ‘masks’ giant numbers of essential security indicators … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc24 as follows …
A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of at the very least 2, chi-squared statistic of at the very least 4, and three or extra circumstances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the particular vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:
Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally making an attempt to make the vaccines look secure would use the phrase ‘and’ within the definition of a security sign.
Utilizing ‘and’ implies that if any one of many situations is not glad, no security sign might be generated. As famous beneath, the PRR will not often set off which nearly ensures that the majority occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.
The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will not often exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of hostile occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the system is a large quantity) so the numerator is at all times close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ isn’t triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”
A Fictitious Instance
Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch defined how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly underneath the radar and never get flagged, due to this flawed system:25
“Suppose we’ve got the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes hostile occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 completely different hostile occasions, and every hostile occasion has 1,000 situations.
That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let us take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million hostile occasions complete.
Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we aren’t even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 folks in a 12 months … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘secure’ utilizing the PRR system.”
Calculating Demise Sign for the COVID Jab
Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR for demise for the COVID jab — utilizing VAERS knowledge and the CDC’s definitions and system. As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 hostile occasions complete for all vaccines aside from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million hostile occasions complete for the COVID jabs. This is the system as defined by Kirsch:26
“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the hostile occasions generated by the vaccine, the demise sign didn’t get drowned out!
However there’s nonetheless the chi-square take a look at. Chi-square take a look at outcomes have been 18,549 for ‘demise,’ which drastically exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square take a look at is clearly glad for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the demise sign is so large, it even survived the PRR take a look at.
Which means that even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … system, all three standards have been glad:
1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3. 3 or extra reviews: There have been over 31,214 demise reviews obtained by VAERS … which is greater than 3
A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … Lots of of 1000’s of American lives have been misplaced because of the incapability of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation … It has been identified since at the very least 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative threat than PRR.27 I do not know why the CDC would not use it.”
The CDC can be hiding the severity of uncomfortable side effects in different methods. As defined by Fenton,28 the way in which uncomfortable side effects are categorized by the CDC assist obfuscate the dimensions of sure issues. For instance, “cardiac failure acute,” “cardiac failure,” “infarction,” “myocardial pressure” and “myocardial fibrosis” are listed as separate classes, although in actual life they’re all potential results of myocarditis.
By separating them, you find yourself with fewer frequency counts per class, thereby providing you with an underpowered chi-square take a look at so {that a} warning sign will not be triggered. If associated classes have been merged, far stronger security indicators would probably emerge.
CDC Has No Affordable Protection
The CDC is accountable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Secure, and between these two databases, there is not any potential manner they may ever say they did not know the photographs have been harming and killing thousands and thousands of People.
The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered29) confirmed huge will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers circumstances.30
The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to folks of all ages, together with infants and pregnant girls.
They even added these poisonous photographs to the childhood vaccine schedule — which permits states to mandate them for varsity attendance — with out addressing any of the 66 security indicators discovered within the CDC’s PRR evaluation. The very fact of the matter is that the CDC has identified about these dangers all alongside, and there is not any excuse for not sharing and appearing on these knowledge.
Assist Unfold the Phrase
Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so assist unfold the phrase. Everybody must know what the CDC’s security knowledge reveal. To that finish, listed below are just a few recommendations for how one can assist:
- Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to analyze the CDC’s security monitoring — We can not have a public security company that’s incapable of monitoring security and taking acceptable motion when issues are discovered, be it correcting a flawed system or asserting {that a} security sign has been detected. In fact, they have to additionally publish their findings as soon as an investigation has been made.
- Contact your native newspaper and urge them to analyze and report on the CDC’s failure to behave on security indicators.
- Share the info on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical group is investigating these issues.
- Share this data along with your physician and members of the medical group.
- Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to clarify how and why, in gentle of those knowledge, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID photographs.
